reBlogged 22 days ago
reBlogged 22 days ago
I’m taking an experimental animation course this semester, and I’m so excited about it I can hardly contain myself. We were asked to write a paper in which we give our own definition of “experimental animation” and imagine a new form of animation that we’ve never seen before. I imagined four. I wanted to share the paper with you…

In order to define “experimental animation,” I must first define “animation.” Using the broadest possible definition, animation is simply the display of a sequence of images in rapid succession so as to create the illusion of movement. Coincidentally, this definition is broad enough to encompass all film, as it could be said that what is traditionally called “live action” film or video is actually animated photography. Early in film and animation history, the ambiguity of this distinction was far more apparent. Eadweard Muybridge’s photo series capturing motion, for instance, when viewed in succession, were called “animated.” The same word was applied to many pre-cinema motion picture devices such as the zoetrope and flip-book, even when photographs were used. Georges Méliès used animation techniques such as stop motion, hand painting, and time-lapse extensively in his films, and likely made no distinction between these and more “standard” film techniques he pioneered such as double exposure and dissolves.
Since that time, animation and film have both grown into distinct and more clearly defined mediums with their own sets of techniques, rules, and aesthetics. It is experimental animation, then, that attempts to break down these restrictions and restore to the medium of animation the sense of limitless possibility felt by early animators such as Méliès. As a filmmaker and videomaker who aims to break barriers of aesthetics, definitions, and methods of working in those mediums, I am especially interested in exploring the close relationships between film, video, photography, collage, sculpture, and animation.

It is somewhat difficult for me to “invent” new forms or techniques of animation as I consider my exposure to experimental animation rather limited. That said, I’ve been very excited about this class and have been brainstorming ideas all summer. One idea I’ve had was to combine animated cut-out photographs with stop motion objects. An animated photograph cut-out of a man’s head would be able to smoke an actual cigarette (perhaps several, very rapidly – as they would burn far faster than I could replace the cut-outs to be photographed) and blow actual smoke through a hole poked in the cut-out’s mouth. The same technique could be used to animate a cut-out person devouring food… or anything! Long wooden dowels pushed through a hole in the cardboard to give the impression of being eaten. Ten feet of steel chain, curled in a pile on the ground and sucked up like spaghetti. An especially large cut-out head (or one with an unhinged jaw) could devour an entire human being – their legs kicking in the air as they’re “swallowed.”
Another idea, inspired by the music of Steve Reich and Philip Glass, was to create animation that ran on several separately timed loops. For instance, my first project will animate each of a drummer’s limbs separately, each playing in a separate time signature. Each of these limbs will be able to loop infinitely, going in and out of sync with each other and creating new, unusual patterns for several minutes. Any number of different beats could be created for each limb – allowing for infinite combinations.

As long as I’m left to my imagination and not constrained by practicality though – why not go all out? Let my imagination run wild? How about animating buildings? I’ve seen stop-motion films of buildings being constructed, but these are always merely an animator documenting the will of an architect. What if it were to work the other way around? Architects working together with animators as would a sculptor on a stop-motion film. A building spreading out through a city in all directions – being demolished on one end as it’s built anew on the other. In stop motion appearing to crawl like a snake down the streets; climb up alongside other buildings, over top, and spiral back down around them; before finally disappearing into the ground, only to resurface again in another city (presumed to have burrowed through the earth); all this time office workers going about their daily business in the innards of this strange creature – forced to move their desks almost daily as their board rooms are torn down and new ones constructed right next door.


Slightly more practical: a Manhattan-based performance art group, The Surveillance Camera Players, protests the ubiquitous presence of surveillance cameras in the city by performing plays in front of city-funded cameras. Because most of these cameras only capture a single still image every 30 seconds or so (and without sound) the plays are performed by holding extended poses and utilizing large placards with writing and drawings. But there’s so much more potential! A security camera working in this way already functions like a time-lapse or stop-motion camera, the only difference being that the resulting video is played back at the same rate as it’s recorded. If the footage was instead sped up to 24 or 12 or even 6 or 3 frames per second (and if it was possible to know when the stills were taken) it would be possible to create pixilation animations like those of Norman McLaren or the Bolex Brothers. Such animations, created by actors in public spaces utilizing hidden cameras, would double as bizarre performance art pieces – jerky, spasmodic plays performed in ultra slow motion. The SCP has performed adaptations of satirical works by George Orwell and Alfred Jarry. An animated adaptation of Emile Courtet, the inventor of the pixilation technique and a likeminded contemporary of Jarry, would make perfect sense. The only problem? In the U.S., government surveillance camera footage isn’t made available to the public.

I guess keep an eye out for when I post some of the animations I’ll be making (I started working on the drummer animation yesterday). That said, keep an eye out for when I post any of my films, period. I keep saying I’m going to put them online and I keep putting it off. Soonish. I promise. Maybe. I hope. I’m a busy guy!
reBlogged 28 days ago
I recently came across this TV interview with cultural studies superstar Slavoj Zizek. From the looks of it, Nitebeat is or was a late night talk show. They must have been hard up for guests that night, because the host clearly has no idea what to make of Zizek. Yet the worldâs greatest Slovenian philosopher rises to the challenge, and gives a funny, entertaining and insightful interview. What he says about tolerance, in particular, I found thought-provoking.
Bonus trivia for acquaintances of the Sans Everything blogging team: Zizek has the same hand gestures as one us. Can you guess who it is?
For those who canât get enough, there is also a hilarious Q & A with Zizek at The Guardian.
Hat tip: Prologus.
reBlogged about 1 month ago

Japanese Barack Obama Impersonator (via Japan Probe)
reBlogged about 1 month ago
reBlogged about 1 month ago
Above is a younger version of myself somewhere I most likely shouldn't of been at my age. Dig the Bodies In Panic graffiti slighty obscurred in the background! I have no idea why my right eye looks like it was sown shut, but it could of been because I talked too much smack about either Chronic Smog or Neurotic Impulse. I really can't recall at this codger like moment in my life. Thanks to Ken Salerno for digging this image up and reminding me that once upon a time, I was actually much smaller.HOW I LEARNED TO STOP WORRYING AND LOVE FRANK O'HARA
reBlogged about 1 month ago
The closest I've ever come to a fist-fight was in my sophomore year in college, at a bar on Amsterdam Avenue, after a heated argument with an editor of the Columbia Review. The point of contention? Whether T.S. Eliot or Frank O'Hara was the better poet. This memory makes me smile, not because it's silly to get a black eye for defending an aesthetic preference--it isn't, entirely--but because today I wouldn't so foolishly write off Frank O'Hara.
The argument itself boils down to a disagreement over the place of seriousness in poetry. Eliot was high serious, just as he was highbrow and High Church Anglican. For him, poetry was a brooding art, born in the long, dark night of civilisation's soul. O'Hara, by contrast, was playful, campy, irreverent. He wrote as he lived: exuberantly, with a surfeit of exclamation points. When his nerves were bothering him, as they often seemed to do, Eliot put Parsifal on the gramophone; when O'Hara was drunk, as he often was, he listened to Charlie Parker.
In his famous essay, "Tradition and the Individual Talent", Eliot wrote in favour of impersonal poetry and peopled his poems with figures from literature and mythology. O'Hara found this stuffy, and parodied what he called "abstract removal" in his mock-manifesto, "Personism." His short lyrics are bawdy gatherings at which his friends, lovers and colleagues drop in for a drink or three. ("For Grace, After A Party" for example, or "Poem Read at Joan Mitchell's" or "A Party Full of Friends", all of which have been included in Mark Ford's recent, discerning selection of O'Hara's poetry and prose.) Or in these lines, celebrating the painter Jane Freilicher's engagement:
and Joan was surprising you with a party for which I was the decoy
but you were surprising us by getting married and going away
so I am here reading poetry anyway
and no one will be bored by me because you're hereYesterday I felt very tired from being at the FIVE SPOT
and today I felt very tired from going to bed early and reading ULYSSES
but tonight I feel energetic because I'm sort of the bugle,
like waking people up, of your peculiar desire to get married ("Poem Read at Joan Mitchell's")
How could one prefer the insufferable pedant to the jolly man-about-town? Well, I was 19, and poetry was my religion. Fun, at least where line breaks were concerned, was heretical. Poetry, I believed, should elevate its readers--we angsty few--above the banalities of existence, help us to mourn the increasingly rapid decline of our culture, allow us to place collect calls to the genius dead for advice on how to live authentic lives. Sure, Eliot's poems were difficult and depressing, but when you sign up to sweep the floor of the temple, you don't complain that the hours are long, that the working-conditions are poor or that your peers are all out dancing.
Ultimately, the truce between O'Hara and me was brokered by New York City, a mutual friend. Visiting Battery Park one day, I noticed a quote from his prose poem, "Meditations in an Emergency", which would lend its name to the title of his first published collection, written in gold along the railings. It read:
One need never leave the confines of New York to get all the greenery one wishes--I can't even enjoy a blade of grass unless I know there's a subway handy or a record store or some other sign that people do not totally regret life.
Like Baudelaire in Paris, like Eliot in London, O'Hara was a city poet. What's more, his city was my city, and that is a strong enough foundation to support a relationship several-storeys high. Eliot remains the superior poet--il miglior fabbro, if you like--but O'Hara's "Meditations in an Emergency" and "Lunch Poems" have found their way into my back pocket far more often than has "The Waste Land" or "The Four Quartets" in recent years.
* * * * *
Frank O'Hara arrived in New York in the summer of 1951--exactly a half-century before I did--after tours of duty at Harvard, in the Navy and in a Master's programme in the music department of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He got a job working at the ticket counter at the Museum of Modern Art. From there--and from the San Remo bar and the Cedar Tavern in Greenwich Village--he became a lightening rod for the city's poets and painters.
Like Guillaume Apollinaire during the Banquet Years in Paris, O'Hara was New York's "impresario of the avant-garde". Around him coalesced what would become known as the New York School of poetry. He counted poets John Ashbery, Kenneth Koch, James Schuyler and LeRoi Jones (now known as Amiri Baraka) as his personal friends, creative interlocutors, mutual muses and mentors. He was the link between the New York School and the Beats, and between them all and pioneering painters such as Willem DeKooning, Jasper Johns, Jane Freilicher and Larry Rivers.
More than any other artist of his generation, O'Hara took Paul Goodman's observations about advanced-guard writing to heart. Following Goodman's advice, O'Hara established a community by "putting his arms around [his fellow artists] and drawing them together." Like a latter-day Clarissa Dalloway, O'Hara threw parties that were really external metaphors for his own multitudinous personality:
What confusion! and to think
I sat down and caused it all! No!...
...I
don't care. Someone's going
to stay until the cows
come home. Or my name isn't
Frank O'Hara ("A Party Full of Friends ")
Goodman believed that friends were the key to any successful artistic movement: "In literary terms, this means: to write for and about them personally." And that's exactly what O'Hara did. Grace Hartigan, a painter, appears in a number of his poems, as does Freilicher, as do Kenneth Koch and his wife Janice. He wrote an ode to DeKooning, and dedicated poems to Larry Rivers and James Schuyler. In "John Button Birthday", he writes, "...I remember JA" that is, John Ashbery,
staggering over to me at the San Remo and murmuring
"I've met someone MARVELLOUS!" That's friendship
for you, and the sentiment of introduction.
Murmuring in capital letters and exclamation points: that's Frank O'Hara for you. One would be hard pressed to come up with a more accurate description of his own brief yet expansive lyrics.
But the friend that appears more often than any other in his work is New York itself. O'Hara characterised his poems as "I do this, I do that" pieces, in which he plays a flaneur moving through the city's streets at an energetic clip. "It is 12:10 in New York and I am wondering / if I will finish this in time to meet Norman for lunch," is a characteristic opening salvo ("Adieu to Norman, Bon Jour to Joan and Jean-Paul").
In his hands, mundane details of city life are magically amplified. In O'Hara's New York there is a "Heaven on Earth Bldg / near the Williamsburg Bridge" where the young of America can repair with "pleasant strangers" after a night at the movies ("Ave Maria"). This building is not to be confused with "515 Madison Avenue", which may or may not be the "door to heaven" itself ("Rhapsody"). In O'Hara's New York, the "drunken and credulous" latrines on 14th Street are to be preferred to the ones on 53rd Street for furtive trysts ("Homosexuality"); the neon sign at the Cedar Tavern is good luck to rub ("Poem Read at Joan Mitchell's"); and there is a "Paradise Bar" on St Marks Place ("Post the Lake Poets Ballad").
Even the moon, rarely seen through the city's skyscrapers, becomes "so beautiful when we look up suddenly / and there it is gliding broken-faced over the bridges" ("Avenue A"). New York is not a city that has ever lacked for admiring wordsmiths, but few have captured the excitement of living here better than O'Hara did in his 15 years of residence.
* * * * *
Saul Bellow, who elevated Chicago to similar heights, once wrote that America takes a perverse pride in its dead poets. By committing suicide, or by succumbing to alcoholism or insanity or expatriation, they testify to the fact that American reality is too great a burden for any but the most practical men to bear. Though O'Hara died young, at the age of 40, when he was hit by a dune buggy after a long night of heavy drinking on Fire Island, his life and work resist a reflexive, all-too-easy placement in the canon of American poet-martyrs.
One gets the impression that O'Hara was very much at home in America, especially that sliver from the East River to the shining Hudson. He wrote enthusiastically about Hollywood movies, jazz and even, when sipped in the right company, Coca-Cola. It is difficult to imagine Poe, Crane, Eliot, Berryman, Schwartz or Plath--incorrigible melancholics about whom Bellow's observation rings true--yawlping, as O'Hara did, "YIPPEE I'm glad I'm alive!" ("Ode to Michael Goldberg ('s Birth and Other Births)")
And, of these poets, only O'Hara actually makes you feel that way, too. Reading his poetry provides a rush not unlike the one you get when your train unexpectedly goes express to your stop.
(Ryan Ruby is a writer based in New York. He is working on a novel set among the bohemians in postwar Greenwich Village.)
reBlogged about 1 month ago

Support the Obama Campaign: Official Black President T-Shirts
reBlogged about 1 month ago

The Underground Restaurant Movement
reBlogged about 1 month ago
Melena Ryzik in the NYT:
The passionate enthusiasts who have opened dozens of unlicensed restaurants in apartments and other private spaces in recent years do not generally aspire to become traditional restaurateurs, with overhead and investors and the health department — a k a The Man — telling them what to do. They are not in it for the money or for Buddha Bar-size crowds; instead, they say, they are in it for the community and the creative freedom. It’s hard to imagine even the most adventurous legitimate restaurant encouraging customers to hack the hindquarters off a boar’s carcass. And underground restaurants have found their niche. Stringing together the farm-to-table movement and a bloggy kind of interactivity, they have gained a following among food lovers, mostly in their 20s and 30s, who have an opinion on local versus organic, prefer intimate and casual to grand and ceremonial, and are open to meeting people and building connections in new ways. No doubt a lot of them are members of a Facebook fan club for bacon.
“Any night of the week you can go out to dinner, but this is unique,” said Jeremy Townsend, a founder of Ghetto Gourmet, an early underground restaurant based in Oakland, Calif. “People want to get out of that cookie-cutter experience and have a shared experience that has some meaning and authenticity, and some story behind it.” Mr. Townsend’s Web site, theghet.com, tracks the movement; the number of underground restaurants has doubled in the last year, to about 70, he said.
reBlogged about 1 month ago
reBlogged about 1 month ago
We have looked at a few simulacra and a number are rather disappointing but I must say the appearance of the BVM in the bark of a tree in Canada is not only one of the best I've seen (although I'm seeing something like the face of Gandalf there giving it more of the look of a sinister, bearded monk) but also may already have caused one "miracle":

An uncanny likeness of the Virgin Mary formed into the bark of a Scarborough tree has left dumbfounded residents wondering if their neighbourhood has been divinely blessed.
Some have even been brought to tears by the surreal Mary in the tree.
"I don't know why it's there, but I think it's a blessing," said Christopher Moreau, 47, who discovered the tree-bound Mary last week. "It raises the hair on your neck, it gives you chills."
...
Moreau, an 18-year superintendent of a downtown condo building, said he did a double-take.
"At first I thought I was seeing things," he said. "Then I went and got my mother-in-law to tell her. She was overwhelmed by it. She was crying."
What's more, Moreau's mom-in-law, who is in her 70s and lives with the Moreaus, last week received test results showing that her lymph node cancer appears to have been cleared.
His reaction is interesting:
For Moreau, who was raised Catholic, the Mary incarnation "strengthens" his faith, he said. But despite the inspiration, Moreau said he won't be attending Mass more oftern. He said he disagrees with the Catholic church's emphasis on collecting money from churchgoers -- and questioned why the Vatican is so rich when poverty is rampant.
"Why do I need to go to church?" Moreau added. "I feel that God has come to me."
There are many paths to enlightenment, including the garden path (apparently).
William T. Vollmann’s $55 Book
reBlogged about 1 month ago
William T. Vollmann’s Imperial, which has been in the works for years, now has a publication date. It’s slated to be released by Viking on April 16, 2009. For those who have scratched their heads in disbelief over Vollmann’s svelte volumes in recent years, don’t worry. The book runs 1,296 pages. And this time, it’s a history of the Imperial County region, chronicling the labor camps, migrant workers, and contemporary day laborers. The book promises to take us into “the dark soul of American imperialism,” with the catalog further informing us:
Known for his penetrating meditations on poverty and violence, Vollmann has spent ten years doggedly investigating every facet of this binational locus, raiding archives, exploring polluted rivers, guarded factories, and Chinese tunnels, talking with everyone from farmers to border patrolmen in his search for the fading American dream and its Mexican equivalent.
Well, this all sounds dutifully proletarian. But the great irony here is that most of the workers who Vollmann talked with are probably not going to be able to afford this book. Imperial, listed in the Winter 2009 Viking catalog, is planning to retail for $55.
This is a surprising price, given that Penguin (under the Penguin Press imprint) also released the hardcover Thomas Pynchon’s Against the Day, which ran a hefty 1,085 pages, for $35. (Consider also Roberto Bolano’s upcoming 2666, running close to 1,000 pages in a three-volume set by FSG. It’s available this November for $30.) And while Imperial also contains “28 photos; 20 pieces b&w line art; 5 maps,” I fail to see how any of this supplemental material justifies a dramatic increase in printing costs (in this case, a good $20 per unit).
The book can also be pre-ordered at Amazon at 40% off, with the book selling for $34.65. But I can’t help but wonder how this twenty dollar difference may affect independent bookstores featuring the title on the stacks. Will Vollmann readers abandon their trusted indie bookstores for Amazon because the price point here is too high? Is this a grand ruse designed to get Vollmann signing the least number of books possible at a signing?
Maybe the $55 book is just a simple capitalist experiment. But if it is, it reminds me more of the troubling science perfected by concert promoters in the late ’90’s. I have no idea if Vollmann’s head has grown heavy and his sight has grown dim (let us hope not), but The Eagles, rather famously, were the first band to charge $100 a ticket. And when the Eagles were able to get away with this, other big acts followed suit. So if Vollmann and Viking want to blindside consumers with such an outrageous price, I may be tempted, despite my frequent championing of hardcovers, to jump aboard Levi Asher’s dysfunctional pricing bandwagon.
In the meantime, I intend to perform a few inquiries to find out why Imperial is going for $55. If I learn anything, I will certainly report it here.
RNC Video: Homeless say St. Paul is trying to hide them during the RNC
reBlogged about 1 month ago
Before and After #143: Barack Obama
reBlogged about 1 month ago